AIAI Infrastructure Map
CompaniesInsightsMapsCompareNewsletterWatchlistStrategy

Technology comparison

Copper Interconnect vs Optical Interconnect

A comparison of electrical and optical connectivity for data movement in AI infrastructure.

Research fieldCopper InterconnectOptical Interconnect
What it isElectrical data movement through traces, cables, retimers, and active electrical links.Data movement through optical modules, fibers, lasers, and photonic components.
Why it mattersCopper can be economical and practical over short reaches.Optical becomes more important as distance, bandwidth, and power constraints increase.
Where it is usedInside servers, racks, and short-reach connections.Rack-to-rack, switch-to-switch, and higher-bandwidth data center links.
Pros
  • Lower cost at short reach
  • Familiar integration
  • Strong ecosystem
  • Longer reach
  • Bandwidth scaling
  • Electrical isolation
Cons
  • Reach and signal integrity limits
  • Power at high speeds
  • Module cost
  • Operational handling
  • Supply chain complexity
Key companies
  • Credo Technology
  • Astera Labs
  • Broadcom
  • Lumentum
  • Coherent
  • Applied Optoelectronics
  • Corning
Adoption uncertaintyMedium. Copper remains useful but faces physical limits.Medium. Optical demand grows, but architecture choices vary.

Key Companies

Astera Labs

ALAB · Public · United States

High risk

Connectivity semiconductor company focused on high-speed data movement inside AI and cloud infrastructure systems.

4/5
Lumentum

LITE · Public · United States

Medium risk

Optical component and laser supplier with relevance to high-speed data center connectivity and photonics roadmaps.

4/5

Related Articles