Energy layer
Datacenter Power Calculator
Estimate MW capacity required for an AI training or inference cluster of a given size.
The engineer question
How much power does an AI cluster of N GPUs need?
Where the data lives today
The current quarter snapshot is generated by the V17 Phase D Product Landscape module and lives on the parent topic page. The interactive comparator below ships once a structured spec datasource is wired.
View Energy product landscape →Result
- IT load (accelerators only)
- 7,000 kW
- IT load (incl. server overhead)+30% for CPU / memory / NIC / storage
- 9,100 kW
- Facility load (IT × PUE 1.30)
- 11.83 MW
- Sized capacity (N+1)What the substation contract has to deliver
- 13.01 MW
- Annual energy
- 103.6 GWh
- Annual electricity cost@ $0.08/kWh
- $8.3 M
Recommendation
13 MW is a mid-size colo fit. Most Tier-3 colocation providers can deliver this in 6–12 months on existing campuses.
Assumptions
- · NVIDIA H100 SXM5: 700 W TDP per accelerator (sustained training draw can be 5–15% higher than nameplate)
- · Server overhead factor: 1.3× (CPU + memory + storage + NIC, typical for an 8-GPU server)
- · PUE: 1.30 (1.10–1.25 for liquid-cooled hyperscale 2026; 1.4–1.6 for air-cooled colo)
- · Electricity cost: $0.08/kWh, US industrial blended average; varies $0.04–$0.18 by state
- · Redundancy factor (N+1): 1.1× applied to nameplate capacity, not utilisation
- · Excludes: future training intensity ramps, idle / between-job consumption (subtract ~20%), spot pricing arbitrage
Worked example (default inputs)
Result
- IT load (accelerators only)
- 7,000 kW
- IT load (incl. server overhead)+30% for CPU / memory / NIC / storage
- 9,100 kW
- Facility load (IT × PUE 1.30)
- 11.83 MW
- Sized capacity (N+1)What the substation contract has to deliver
- 13.01 MW
- Annual energy
- 103.6 GWh
- Annual electricity cost@ $0.08/kWh
- $8.3 M
Recommendation
13 MW is a mid-size colo fit. Most Tier-3 colocation providers can deliver this in 6–12 months on existing campuses.
Assumptions
- · NVIDIA H100 SXM5: 700 W TDP per accelerator (sustained training draw can be 5–15% higher than nameplate)
- · Server overhead factor: 1.3× (CPU + memory + storage + NIC, typical for an 8-GPU server)
- · PUE: 1.30 (1.10–1.25 for liquid-cooled hyperscale 2026; 1.4–1.6 for air-cooled colo)
- · Electricity cost: $0.08/kWh, US industrial blended average; varies $0.04–$0.18 by state
- · Redundancy factor (N+1): 1.1× applied to nameplate capacity, not utilisation
- · Excludes: future training intensity ramps, idle / between-job consumption (subtract ~20%), spot pricing arbitrage
Related tools in the Energy layer
PUE Comparison
Compare PUE benchmarks across hyperscale operators, regions, and cooling approaches.
US Electricity Cost by Region
Per-state industrial electricity rate snapshot + 12-month trend, indexed to datacenter footprint.
Cooling Load Estimator
Estimate the cooling tonnage / liquid-cooling capacity needed for a given rack density.